We are using cookies for secure log-in and to improve our app.
First party only, no data krakens 🦑 Learn more in our privacy policy.
AI is becoming part of almost every software development workflow, and test automation is no exception. ChatGPT in particular has quickly become a go-to companion for testers and developers. It helps teams move faster, understand requirements more clearly, and produce test code with far less friction.
But while ChatGPT can be immensely helpful, it’s not a full test automation engine. It shines in specific areas and falls short in others. Understanding that balance is key to using it well.
Many teams start using ChatGPT because it removes a lot of the grunt work from scripting tests in particular. Instead of writing every test case or test script by hand, you can have ChatGPT draft the foundation - leaving you to refine and adapt it.
Here are the areas where ChatGPT consistently performs well:
Give it a user story, acceptance criteria, or a product description, and it can outline:
It often surfaces scenarios teams forget when they’re moving fast.
ChatGPT is strong at producing boilerplate test code in frameworks like:
It can also translate tests between frameworks, clean up messy code, and help you choose better patterns.
Paste a failing stack trace or logs and ask what might be wrong. ChatGPT can spot patterns or incorrect assumptions quickly and suggest the most likely fixes.
Need complex JSON payloads, test personas, or malformed inputs? ChatGPT can generate them instantly, saving you from manual formatting.
It’s surprisingly good at brainstorming “how this feature might break,” helping you widen your exploratory coverage.
Even though ChatGPT feels powerful, it's important to remember what it can’t do.
ChatGPT cannot:
It only reasons from text.
It can't do:
Because it doesn’t execute the code:
Human review is always required.
ChatGPT will not update your selectors when the UI changes or proactively repair failing tests. You must feed it the updated context each time. It can't maintain the test code.
Unless you paste everything in, it doesn’t know:
This limits how accurate it can be.
Full-stack testing platforms will never be overloaded by a 10.000 loC test suite, but ChatGPT will, because it doesn't need to/ can't see context by definition.
Not every organization wants to paste logs, source code, or crash reports into a public AI.
ChatGPT is fantastic as an assistant - but test automation requires executing tests, inspecting the UI, and adapting to change. For that, you need tools built specifically for autonomous or AI-supported testing.
If your goal is AI-driven test creation, execution, and self-healing, consider platforms such as:
These tools can interact with your product, generate tests from real UI flows, and automatically repair broken selectors.
Great for detecting UI changes that would be tedious to capture with assertions.
Helpful for generating tests based on live traffic or API specifications.
These tools go beyond assistance — they act on your application, maintain tests, and integrate deeply with CI/CD.
ChatGPT has become an invaluable helper for testers. It speeds up thinking, writing, debugging, and brainstorming. But it doesn’t replace test automation frameworks, nor does it maintain tests or adapt them to product changes.
In a modern testing setup, ChatGPT is best used alongside specialized AI-powered testing platforms. ChatGPT accelerates understanding and creation; those tools handle execution and self-healing.
